Skip to main content

Philosophy Publics

Get Your Smart On

  • Home
  • Blog
  • Syllabi
  • About

Connect

  • Substack
  • Medium
  • Bluesky
  • YouTube
  • Ko-fi

Explore

  • All Posts
  • Study Syllabi
  • About
  • Linking Policy
  • Privacy Policy

Subscribe

Get Philosophy Publics in your inbox.

RSS Feed

© 2026 Philosophy Publics. No trackers, no ads.

  1. Home/
  2. Blog/
  3. Philosophy/
  4. A Thousand Plateaus: Capitalism and Schizophrenia by Deleuze and Guattari
March 5, 2025

A Thousand Plateaus: Capitalism and Schizophrenia by Deleuze and Guattari

From the annals of our top fifty books in Philosophy originally published on Goodreads.

A Thousand Plateaus is the second volume of the Capitalism and Schizophrenia project (the first is Anti-Oedipus) by French philosopher Gilles Deleuze and psychoanalyst Felix Guattari. This is a very different kind of philosophy work: A Thousand Plateaus offers a non-linear thought experiment, one that embodies a schizophrenic nomadology of thinking under capitalism. 🤯 I know, right? It’s like an intellectual adventure story where the stakes are your sense of reality.

Readers are encouraged to encounter this work on their own terms, moving along the “plateaus” of the text according to their own rhythm. There is nothing in the history of philosophy to prepare readers for this experience — perhaps reading Hegel for the first time is a similar encounter, but Hegel is nothing if not a structuralist. Readers will need to let A Thousand Plateaus do it’s work on them, at their own risk. It is not wholly without logic, but the nomadic logic of the text can be as captivating as it will be off-putting to some others.

Arguably, this experiment in non-linear thinking has been successful, judging by the kind of influence it has exerted, as it continues to proliferate both inside out outside of philosophy. For example, see Michael Hardt and Antonio Negri’s *Empire *, a case-study in capitalism that takes A Thousand Plateaus as it’s theoretical model; Rosi Braidotti's *Nomadic Subjects *, and Elizabeth Grosz' *Chaos Territory Art Deleuze and the Framing of Earth *.

The project of bringing Marxism and Psychoanalysis into relation is begun in this work, and arguably, the project remains a chief philosophical project in the 21st century.

Here are some choice reviews from Goodreads, for funzies:

“wrote my MA thesis on these fuckers” — katie luisa borgesius

“The most difficult book ever written. EVER. But it’s also liberating as hell. Just sit back and enjoy how strange it makes you feel. And then how ecstatic, confused, angry, etc., all at once. But if you're ever climbing and all of a sudden you realize that you're getting it, like, really getting it, then hang on and stay with it because it will probably change your life when you get to the top. And that feels pretty groovy. Especially when you really have to work for the plateau. It ain’t easy becoming a body without organs. And if you think the reading part pushes you to the limit, just wait till it’s time to sew up the ol’ asshole. The anus machine awaits the stratification of the sewing machine, the needle-and-thread aSSemblage, for the Dogon Egg awaits its de-territorialization! Whether you’re Chasing Freud’s patients alongside a pack of becoming-wolves, or watching poor Dr. Challenger evaporate, or pursuing a line of flight aboard the rhizomatic acid-cloud to Dr. Angrypants’s Masochingdom in the Metallurgy Matrix, ATP will not disappoint. Seriously. Read it. Don’t be afraid.” — The Awdude

“There is a method to the madness within this extraordinary book. At first blush it often seems as if it’s a hodgepodge of a mish mash of stray threads at most loosely connected concerning the paradox of existence, but this book never makes the mistake of taking itself too seriously within its post-structuralism paradigms therefore allowing the reader to pretend to believe what the authors' are saying is deserving of the reader’s attention. By pretending to believe what the authors are saying the book starts to make sense when the reader realizes that the book has multiple levels of interpretations: narrative, literal, metaphorical, and absolute rather than analogical. The book often at times reads as if it was a post-modern novel where space and time have been collapsed into a world without past or future but only the now of synchronic contingency.” — Beauregard Bottomley


Curious to read more? Here are some Substack pieces:

Historical introduction to the first volume, as context:

The Hipcrime VocabCapitalism & Schizophrenia, Part I: Devices and DesiresSo I have been promising for some time to break down (at least the first volume of) Deleuze and Guattari’s principal text, Capitalism & Schizophrenia, entitled Anti-Oedipus. The reasons for this are twofold, mainly. The first is it lets me talk at length about something I am excited by, in the hopes that you might find it educational, and the second is …Read more10 months ago · 2 likes · Citizen LanePhilosophy and BeyondWhat It Means to Do PhilosophyThe question of what philosophy is and what it means to do philosophy is not easy to answer. If I were to ask you, I am pretty sure I would get quite different answers depending on where you live, what kind of education you have, whether you have had philosophical training or not, and what kind of training that is (analytical, phenomenological, and so forth…Read more9 months ago · 10 likes · 1 comment · Romaric Jannel[Marx & friendsFascism at the Limits of CapitalismEtching by April Burke…Read morea year ago · 113 likes · 16 comments · Kevin ThomasALEMÁN Newsletter ¿Cómo lee hoy la (extrema) derecha a Gilles Deleuze? | Amador Fernández-SavaterEn el centenario del nacimiento de Gilles Deleuze se suceden las publicaciones y los seminarios. Pero una de las iniciativas más llamativas sin duda es la de la revista Ideas de la Fundación Disenso (think tank del partido español de extrema derecha Vox) que se pregunta cómo se puede leer desde la derecha a un filósofo que se situó siempre en sus antípo…Read more9 months ago · 14 likes · 1 comment

How do you like this format, joining my review, other’s reviews, and a curated short list of posts on the topic? Comment below:

Share this article

TwitterBlueskyLinkedInFacebookEmail

Related Posts

The Philosopher's Guide to Watching Everything Fall Apart (And What to Do About It) | Part One: Walter Benjamin's Angel of History

“His face is turned toward the past. Where we perceive a chain of events, he sees one single catastrophe which keeps piling wreckage upon wreckage and hurls it in front of his feet. The angel would...

November 19, 2025

Must Work Suck So Much? | Part 5: Production and Reproduction

In previous parts of this series, we saw how work is depoliticized when it is relegated to the private realm of individual choice. Working to politicize work in much the same ways that feminists have...

November 4, 2025

The Pleasures of Excess

One of the big ideas in Linda Williams’s piece on “body genres” in film theory is that perversion should not be used as a pejorative term to condemn some sexualities over others, i.e., to condemn any...

October 29, 2025

Comments available on Substack and Medium. Note: Comments require paid subscriptions on these platforms.

← Back to all posts